<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forums</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ericflint.net/index.php/forums/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ericflint.net</link>
	<description>News announcements and snippets by Eric Flint</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 07:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: donald</title>
		<link>http://www.ericflint.net/index.php/forums/comment-page-1/#comment-53901</link>
		<dc:creator>donald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericflint.net/?page_id=14#comment-53901</guid>
		<description>i was wondering what the exact chronological order of the 1632 series is because every book says something different, please let me know</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was wondering what the exact chronological order of the 1632 series is because every book says something different, please let me know</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mouktar</title>
		<link>http://www.ericflint.net/index.php/forums/comment-page-1/#comment-42323</link>
		<dc:creator>Mouktar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 05:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericflint.net/?page_id=14#comment-42323</guid>
		<description>i think that it would be really cool for you to start adding stuff about how china and ottoman empire  start reacting to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that it would be really cool for you to start adding stuff about how china and ottoman empire  start reacting to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Cedeno</title>
		<link>http://www.ericflint.net/index.php/forums/comment-page-1/#comment-31987</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Cedeno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericflint.net/?page_id=14#comment-31987</guid>
		<description>1632 being discussed by tech geeks.  Imagine that...

http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/geekend/?p=458</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1632 being discussed by tech geeks.  Imagine that&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/geekend/?p=458" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/geekend/?p=458</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.ericflint.net/index.php/forums/comment-page-1/#comment-20534</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericflint.net/?page_id=14#comment-20534</guid>
		<description>Hi, I greatly enjoy the 163x series (needs to be called something larger than "series" -- I think it's grown beyond a single dimension by now).

I've wondered whether Mike Stearns will receive blowback when he leaves the office of PM from some of his most faithful supporters -- because when they took their oath to the USE, they thought they were taking it to Mike, the "Prince of Germany". It might not have clicked with them that they were swearing fealty to an abstraction. And if it didn't click, they might see his stepping down as a betrayal on his part. My understanding is that an oath of fealty is analogous to a marriage vow. If the office of "husband" were passed around at the whim of some wierd balloting ceremony, I could see how a wife could get a tad upset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I greatly enjoy the 163x series (needs to be called something larger than &#8220;series&#8221; &#8212; I think it&#8217;s grown beyond a single dimension by now).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve wondered whether Mike Stearns will receive blowback when he leaves the office of PM from some of his most faithful supporters &#8212; because when they took their oath to the USE, they thought they were taking it to Mike, the &#8220;Prince of Germany&#8221;. It might not have clicked with them that they were swearing fealty to an abstraction. And if it didn&#8217;t click, they might see his stepping down as a betrayal on his part. My understanding is that an oath of fealty is analogous to a marriage vow. If the office of &#8220;husband&#8221; were passed around at the whim of some wierd balloting ceremony, I could see how a wife could get a tad upset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Mackey</title>
		<link>http://www.ericflint.net/index.php/forums/comment-page-1/#comment-18350</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericflint.net/?page_id=14#comment-18350</guid>
		<description>Sir,
I would like to know if the book Desperate and Dispicable Dwarf (Joes World series) will be coming out in the near future, and does the new title you have created for the Joes World have a release date?  Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir,<br />
I would like to know if the book Desperate and Dispicable Dwarf (Joes World series) will be coming out in the near future, and does the new title you have created for the Joes World have a release date?  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McTurbo</title>
		<link>http://www.ericflint.net/index.php/forums/comment-page-1/#comment-18036</link>
		<dc:creator>McTurbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericflint.net/?page_id=14#comment-18036</guid>
		<description>Well. I must say that i have enjoyed most of your novels, and your one of the writers that i look forward to seeing when new material comes out. but i think you missed the point that your two disgruntled readers were trying to point out. 

while i wont call the anthologies and short stories that are put out trash. i will say they are mildly entertaining, and something that i dont mind reading while im waiting on the rest of the series. I do believe that both individuals are more disgruntled by the fact that after reading 32 and 33 .. the reader is just kinda left up in the air as to what happens next. this for me personally has been less than pleasing. had thier not been so much distance between the last novels and the current.. then perhaps thier disatisfaction would not be so great. we have recieved a large amount of short stories or fanfiction, or side stories but very little on the main story for some time

As you said yourself, the drought should be less this time around. I eagerly await your next novel in the 16xx series.

.. on a lighter note. 

I myself have also stopped reading the Robert Jordon series. if he actually finishes it or begins to wrap the series up i may pick it up again.. but for now.. going in circles with your readers.. isnt very fun.

last but not least.. have you read the Crosstime Engineer series by Leo Frankowski? if so what were your thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well. I must say that i have enjoyed most of your novels, and your one of the writers that i look forward to seeing when new material comes out. but i think you missed the point that your two disgruntled readers were trying to point out. </p>
<p>while i wont call the anthologies and short stories that are put out trash. i will say they are mildly entertaining, and something that i dont mind reading while im waiting on the rest of the series. I do believe that both individuals are more disgruntled by the fact that after reading 32 and 33 .. the reader is just kinda left up in the air as to what happens next. this for me personally has been less than pleasing. had thier not been so much distance between the last novels and the current.. then perhaps thier disatisfaction would not be so great. we have recieved a large amount of short stories or fanfiction, or side stories but very little on the main story for some time</p>
<p>As you said yourself, the drought should be less this time around. I eagerly await your next novel in the 16xx series.</p>
<p>.. on a lighter note. </p>
<p>I myself have also stopped reading the Robert Jordon series. if he actually finishes it or begins to wrap the series up i may pick it up again.. but for now.. going in circles with your readers.. isnt very fun.</p>
<p>last but not least.. have you read the Crosstime Engineer series by Leo Frankowski? if so what were your thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilford Tibbetts</title>
		<link>http://www.ericflint.net/index.php/forums/comment-page-1/#comment-16620</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilford Tibbetts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 01:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericflint.net/?page_id=14#comment-16620</guid>
		<description>I finally bought "1634: Cannon Law".  I've like most of your books, and usually can get into them quickly, but this one is taking awhile.

Boundary: Read this a second time only last week, and loved it even more.  Hope you are able to write a sequel.

Keep up the great work.  I look forward too reading much more. 

Respectfully,

Wilford Tibbetts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally bought &#8220;1634: Cannon Law&#8221;.  I&#8217;ve like most of your books, and usually can get into them quickly, but this one is taking awhile.</p>
<p>Boundary: Read this a second time only last week, and loved it even more.  Hope you are able to write a sequel.</p>
<p>Keep up the great work.  I look forward too reading much more. </p>
<p>Respectfully,</p>
<p>Wilford Tibbetts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Marylander</title>
		<link>http://www.ericflint.net/index.php/forums/comment-page-1/#comment-14774</link>
		<dc:creator>A Marylander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 18:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericflint.net/?page_id=14#comment-14774</guid>
		<description>Well, I'm not sure where I should say this, but I found here and decided it was as good a place as any. I just thought I would suggest a place that the Americans in England might find an ally.

You see, in the year 1632 Charles I granted the charter for the Proprietary Colony of Maryland to Cecil Calvert, the Second Lord Baltimore (the Baltimore in southern Ireland, not the one in Maryland). This was originally Cecil's father's idea. The idea was to establish a haven for (English) Catholics in the new world/make money, and originally they tried with a colony called Avalon in Newfoundland. 

When Cecil got the charter, it took him two years to dispatch settlers aboard the Ark and the Dove to Maryland under his brother, Leonard Calvert, an expedition that left in 1634.

Now, I don't remember when in the 1632-alternate the English sold the New World to the French, so I don't know if that came before or after the settlers left, but I do know that either way Cecil might ally himself with anyone who could help his colony (as he did in reality, with an uneasy balance between Parliament and the king), either simply to make money or to protect his fellow English Catholics.

Even better, if you added a up-timer character who had recently moved to Grantville, WV from Maryland (I'd suggest them being from the Prince Georges County/DC area, Bawlmer (Baltimoreans have a really weird accent), the northwestern counties, or possibly the Annapolis area), and who was really state-patriotic, that'd be even better.

Oh, and a good incentive for the uptimers to help Calvert is the "Act Concerning Religion", more commonly known as the "Act of Toleration", he and his protestant governor, Stone, drafted. Though the Act was extremely intolerant (any non-Christians or those who denied the trinity could be executed)it was a hell of a lot better than a lot of other legislation at the time.

Just wanted to mention this, as inspired by the concurrent dates.

GO FREE STATE!
A Marylander
(Old Line State too, but that has nothing to do with anything.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m not sure where I should say this, but I found here and decided it was as good a place as any. I just thought I would suggest a place that the Americans in England might find an ally.</p>
<p>You see, in the year 1632 Charles I granted the charter for the Proprietary Colony of Maryland to Cecil Calvert, the Second Lord Baltimore (the Baltimore in southern Ireland, not the one in Maryland). This was originally Cecil&#8217;s father&#8217;s idea. The idea was to establish a haven for (English) Catholics in the new world/make money, and originally they tried with a colony called Avalon in Newfoundland. </p>
<p>When Cecil got the charter, it took him two years to dispatch settlers aboard the Ark and the Dove to Maryland under his brother, Leonard Calvert, an expedition that left in 1634.</p>
<p>Now, I don&#8217;t remember when in the 1632-alternate the English sold the New World to the French, so I don&#8217;t know if that came before or after the settlers left, but I do know that either way Cecil might ally himself with anyone who could help his colony (as he did in reality, with an uneasy balance between Parliament and the king), either simply to make money or to protect his fellow English Catholics.</p>
<p>Even better, if you added a up-timer character who had recently moved to Grantville, WV from Maryland (I&#8217;d suggest them being from the Prince Georges County/DC area, Bawlmer (Baltimoreans have a really weird accent), the northwestern counties, or possibly the Annapolis area), and who was really state-patriotic, that&#8217;d be even better.</p>
<p>Oh, and a good incentive for the uptimers to help Calvert is the &#8220;Act Concerning Religion&#8221;, more commonly known as the &#8220;Act of Toleration&#8221;, he and his protestant governor, Stone, drafted. Though the Act was extremely intolerant (any non-Christians or those who denied the trinity could be executed)it was a hell of a lot better than a lot of other legislation at the time.</p>
<p>Just wanted to mention this, as inspired by the concurrent dates.</p>
<p>GO FREE STATE!<br />
A Marylander<br />
(Old Line State too, but that has nothing to do with anything.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.ericflint.net/index.php/forums/comment-page-1/#comment-2208</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericflint.net/?page_id=14#comment-2208</guid>
		<description>I'm a big scifi fan and I happen to really enjoy your 1632 story line both the main story novels and Ring of Fire. I have noticed people on these forums talking about in both positive and negative turns how you have allowed the story of Grantville to be fleshed out. Personally, I have been nothing but impressed with the novels I have read including the Anthologies (Ring of Fire still rates as the best of the anthologies released so far in my opinion). Your willingness to flesh out this universe from multiple perspectives actually has made me more interested in the story and am desperatly craving 1634: The Baltic War to the point where I am almost going crazy.

I am a huge science fiction fan because I like the way it stretches my imagination. I am also a big fan of David Weber's Honor Harrington novels. A big thing I have noticed about the two of you as writers is your ability to incorporate humor that comes naturally from the characters into the stories. I think that more then the battle sequences is what really keeps people into a plot line because my least favorite Honor Harrington novel was Ashes of Victory which didn't suffer from a lack of action.

I think what most people are noticing at least in the anthologies and in 1634 is less developed ability of some writers to create humor in a novel while maintaining or hightening the drama of a story. Still I just want to congradulate you on the hard work you have put into this novels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a big scifi fan and I happen to really enjoy your 1632 story line both the main story novels and Ring of Fire. I have noticed people on these forums talking about in both positive and negative turns how you have allowed the story of Grantville to be fleshed out. Personally, I have been nothing but impressed with the novels I have read including the Anthologies (Ring of Fire still rates as the best of the anthologies released so far in my opinion). Your willingness to flesh out this universe from multiple perspectives actually has made me more interested in the story and am desperatly craving 1634: The Baltic War to the point where I am almost going crazy.</p>
<p>I am a huge science fiction fan because I like the way it stretches my imagination. I am also a big fan of David Weber&#8217;s Honor Harrington novels. A big thing I have noticed about the two of you as writers is your ability to incorporate humor that comes naturally from the characters into the stories. I think that more then the battle sequences is what really keeps people into a plot line because my least favorite Honor Harrington novel was Ashes of Victory which didn&#8217;t suffer from a lack of action.</p>
<p>I think what most people are noticing at least in the anthologies and in 1634 is less developed ability of some writers to create humor in a novel while maintaining or hightening the drama of a story. Still I just want to congradulate you on the hard work you have put into this novels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.ericflint.net/index.php/forums/comment-page-1/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 05:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ericflint.net/?page_id=14#comment-940</guid>
		<description>Remembering the plot isn't very difficult for me. What separates my enjoyment of long series from series that don't get old for me, Honor Harrington, is the introduction of new characters and the essence of the moral philosophy used in those novels.

Jordan, for example, was someone I could no longer tolerate simply because I did not like his characters, I did not like or approve of their actions, and I certainly did not like the fact that plot lines never get wrapped up.

If there's too many new characters introduced, and none of those characters are developed or have had their individual destinies filled in part or whole, then that's a proble for me. If however, there are too few characters, like with the Belisarius series, then that's another dissatisfaction. The Dance of Time was refreshing because it told the story through the eyes of another. Even the most favorite of characters, gets old if the same old same old is seen through their eyes. 

I'm a fan of underdog stories. 1632 obviously was a great story of the underdogs winning in the face of adversity. However, all underdogs eventually either die or they become the top dog. When they do become the top dog, the challenge is no longer there, and therefore the excitement wanes. I was reading Piers Anthony's Bio of a Space Tyrant series, which was one of his more serious and comprehensive works. After the entire series was over, he then wrote a sort of Ender's Shadow like sequel, with the story told from the perspective of another secondary. Even though I knew the exact plot, there were still lots of things I learned and a lot of fun to be had from reading that last book.

The reason why Honor Harrington never got old, was the simple fact that this whole theme of a war being fought by characters you could relate to and cheer on, from both sides, is a very potent mix and study in human nature. And the fact that you could never tell what major plot line would be present in a new novel, adds spice to expectation. The ability to change the main plot line, without actually changing how the series will progress, is a pretty neat trick.

I always liked anime series in which the hero would always get stronger, and face stronger opponents. It doesn't get old, you always get something new to look foward to, and it's fun to see people rise above their own limitations.

I'm a military science fiction reader. I don't like RIngo's fantasy works, and I don't like novels without a strong military esprit de corps. But that's no surprise. The story in 1633 of building a navy from scratch is another story of OTB solutions, and underdogs that will rise to the challenge. Just military stuff won't be enough for me, I got to have new stuff, new people, and stunning plot lines. It helps when I don't get my hopes up. Getting your hopes up is a good way to become demoralized.

I'm not disgruntled by the status of the 1632 novels simply because I don't expect that the next novel will be so stunningly good that I just "must" have it. High expectations are hard to meet, so lower them. Ground the voltage.

Sometimes people become too emotionally involved with novels and characters. It's not just seeing a media story about them on screen, reading actually involves hearing their thoughts and emotions which form a greater connection to the reader. But that has negative consequences as well as positive.

I'm interested in that novel where George Washington's army goes back to the ROman Empire times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remembering the plot isn&#8217;t very difficult for me. What separates my enjoyment of long series from series that don&#8217;t get old for me, Honor Harrington, is the introduction of new characters and the essence of the moral philosophy used in those novels.</p>
<p>Jordan, for example, was someone I could no longer tolerate simply because I did not like his characters, I did not like or approve of their actions, and I certainly did not like the fact that plot lines never get wrapped up.</p>
<p>If there&#8217;s too many new characters introduced, and none of those characters are developed or have had their individual destinies filled in part or whole, then that&#8217;s a proble for me. If however, there are too few characters, like with the Belisarius series, then that&#8217;s another dissatisfaction. The Dance of Time was refreshing because it told the story through the eyes of another. Even the most favorite of characters, gets old if the same old same old is seen through their eyes. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a fan of underdog stories. 1632 obviously was a great story of the underdogs winning in the face of adversity. However, all underdogs eventually either die or they become the top dog. When they do become the top dog, the challenge is no longer there, and therefore the excitement wanes. I was reading Piers Anthony&#8217;s Bio of a Space Tyrant series, which was one of his more serious and comprehensive works. After the entire series was over, he then wrote a sort of Ender&#8217;s Shadow like sequel, with the story told from the perspective of another secondary. Even though I knew the exact plot, there were still lots of things I learned and a lot of fun to be had from reading that last book.</p>
<p>The reason why Honor Harrington never got old, was the simple fact that this whole theme of a war being fought by characters you could relate to and cheer on, from both sides, is a very potent mix and study in human nature. And the fact that you could never tell what major plot line would be present in a new novel, adds spice to expectation. The ability to change the main plot line, without actually changing how the series will progress, is a pretty neat trick.</p>
<p>I always liked anime series in which the hero would always get stronger, and face stronger opponents. It doesn&#8217;t get old, you always get something new to look foward to, and it&#8217;s fun to see people rise above their own limitations.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a military science fiction reader. I don&#8217;t like RIngo&#8217;s fantasy works, and I don&#8217;t like novels without a strong military esprit de corps. But that&#8217;s no surprise. The story in 1633 of building a navy from scratch is another story of OTB solutions, and underdogs that will rise to the challenge. Just military stuff won&#8217;t be enough for me, I got to have new stuff, new people, and stunning plot lines. It helps when I don&#8217;t get my hopes up. Getting your hopes up is a good way to become demoralized.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not disgruntled by the status of the 1632 novels simply because I don&#8217;t expect that the next novel will be so stunningly good that I just &#8220;must&#8221; have it. High expectations are hard to meet, so lower them. Ground the voltage.</p>
<p>Sometimes people become too emotionally involved with novels and characters. It&#8217;s not just seeing a media story about them on screen, reading actually involves hearing their thoughts and emotions which form a greater connection to the reader. But that has negative consequences as well as positive.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested in that novel where George Washington&#8217;s army goes back to the ROman Empire times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
